Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLatsch, M.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, A.
dc.contributor.authorEskes, H.
dc.contributor.authorSneep, M.
dc.contributor.authorWang, P.
dc.contributor.authorVeefkind, P.
dc.contributor.authorLutz, R.
dc.contributor.authorLoyola, D.
dc.contributor.authorArgyrouli, A.
dc.contributor.authorValks, P.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, T.
dc.contributor.authorSihler, H.
dc.contributor.authorVan Roozendael, M.
dc.contributor.authorTheys, N.
dc.contributor.authorYu, H.
dc.contributor.authorSiddans, R.
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, J.P.
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-06T07:55:29Z
dc.date.available2022-11-06T07:55:29Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/10646
dc.descriptionClouds have a strong impact on satellite measurements of tropospheric trace gases in the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared spectral ranges from space. Therefore, trace gas retrievals rely on information on cloud fraction, cloud albedo, and cloud height from cloud products. In this study, the cloud parameters from different cloud retrieval algorithms for the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) are compared: the Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm (OCRA) a priori cloud fraction, the Retrieval Of Cloud Information using Neural Networks (ROCINN) CAL (Clouds-As-Layers) cloud fraction and cloud top and base height, the ROCINN CRB (Clouds-as-Reflecting-Boundaries) cloud fraction and cloud height, the Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A-band (FRESCO) cloud fraction, the interpolated FRESCO cloud height from the TROPOMI NO2 product, the cloud fraction from the NO2 fitting window, the O2–O2 cloud fraction and cloud height, the Mainz Iterative Cloud Retrieval Utilities (MICRU) cloud fraction, and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) cloud fraction. Two different versions of the TROPOMI cloud products OCRA/ROCINN, FRESCO, and the TROPOMI NO2 product are included in the comparisons (processor version 1.x and 2.x). Overall, the cloud parameters retrieved by the different algorithms show qualitative consistency in version 1.x and good agreement in version 2.x with the exception of the VIIRS cloud fraction, which cannot be directly compared to the other data. Differences between the cloud retrievals are found especially for small cloud heights with a cloud fraction threshold of 0.2, i.e. clouds that are particularly relevant for tropospheric trace gas retrievals. The cloud fractions of the different version 2 cloud products primarily differ over snow- and ice-covered pixels and scenes with sun glint, for which only MICRU includes an explicit treatment. All cloud parameters show some systematic problems related to the across-track dependence, where larger values are found at the edges of the satellite view. The consistency between the cloud parameters from different algorithms depends strongly on how the data are filtered for the comparison, for example, what quality value is used or whether snow- and ice-covered pixels are excluded from the analysis. In summary, clear differences were found between the results of various algorithms, but these differences are reduced in the most recent versions of the cloud data.
dc.languageeng
dc.titleIntercomparison of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI cloud products for tropospheric trace gas retrievals
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.source.titleAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue21
dc.source.page6257-6283
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/amt-15-6257-2022
dc.identifier.scopus


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record