Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMusschoot, T.
dc.contributor.authorSnoeks, J.
dc.date2017
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T13:14:28Z
dc.date.available2024-03-14T13:14:28Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/11896
dc.description<P>Pellegrin rejected the validity of <I>Monostichodus elongatus</I>, described by Vaillant and type species of the genus <I>Monostichodus</I>, based on the lack of a proper species description, and redescribed Vaillant's specimens as <I>Hemistichodus vaillanti</I>. After review of the relevant articles in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, however, no arguments were found to consider <I>M. elongatus</I> as a <I>nomen nudum</I>. This implies that <I>Hemistichodus</I> should be considered as a junior synonym of the genus <I>Monostichodus</I>, which includes three valid species: <I>M. elongatus</I> (with <I>Hemistichodus vaillanti</I> as a junior synonym), <I>M. mesmaekersi</I> and <I>M. lootensi</I>.
dc.languageeng
dc.titleRe-establishment of the genus <I>Monostichodus</I> Vaillant 1886 (Characiformes, Distichodontidae).
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiBiological sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.subject.freeVertebrates
dc.source.titleJournal of Fish Biology
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jfb.13218
dc.identifier.rmca4918


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record