Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorHayen, Roald
dc.contributor.authorDe Clercq, Hilde
dc.coverage.spatialBelgiumen_US
dc.coverage.spatialBrusselsen_US
dc.coverage.temporal12th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal13th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal14th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal15th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal16th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal17th centuryen_US
dc.coverage.temporal18th centuryen_US
dc.date2013-09
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-19T15:27:46Z
dc.date.available2024-06-19T15:27:46Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/13308
dc.descriptionThe Coudenberg archaeological site consists of the remains of the former Palace of Brussels, made up of successive building phases ranging from the 12th to the 18th century. After the fire of 1731, the ruins of the Palace were demolished for the purposes of a new urban project: the Royal Square. Although the Palace disappeared from the urban landscape, remains of the basement level are still present beneath the square, and have been made accessible following excavation campaigns carried out over the past twentyfive years. In the case of this study, 17 mortars belonging to the basement of various well-dated building phases were characterized by means of a combination of techniques (optical and scanning electron microscopy, simultaneous thermal analysis as well as an acidic treatment) aiming to identify the mortar composition and to find out the geological source of the raw materials. The binder of the mortars from the 12th to the 17th century is made up of slightly hydraulic lime. The systematic presence of quartz-bearing lime lumps, burnt glauconite grains and ghosts of microfossils/bioclasts allows identifying the raw material used for lime production: the microsparitic sandy limestone rubbles in Brusselian sands of Eocene age (Brusselian stone). The use of Brusselian lime is confirmed by archival documents contemporaneous to the Palace’s construction. The granulometry of the sand used as aggregate is comparable to that of Brusselian sands. The binder/sand ratios determined are close to 1:1 in volume units but don’t represent exactly the mixing ratio used by the masons in the past since a naturally sandy lime was used. No significant compositional changes were noticed related to the building phases or the mortar function. Finally, both the binder and the binder/sand mixing ratio of a more recent mortar (presumably late 18th century) are distinctly different from the earlier mortars.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.titleHistoric mortars from the Coudenberg archaeological site: characterization and source of raw materialsen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.subject.frascatiHistory and Archaeologyen_US
dc.audienceScientificen_US
dc.subject.freemortar characterizationen_US
dc.subject.freeraw materialen_US
dc.subject.freeBrusselian limeen_US
dc.subject.freeBrusselian stoneen_US
dc.subject.freeBrusselian sandsen_US
dc.relation.projectFunded by Palais de Charles Quint asbl / Paleis van Keizer Karel vzwen_US
Orfeo.peerreviewedNot pertinenten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record