Show simple item record

Technical Note: Vapor pressure estimation methods applied to secondary organic aerosol constituents from α-pinene oxidation: an intercomparison study

dc.contributor.authorCompernolle, S.
dc.contributor.authorCeulemans, K.
dc.contributor.authorMüller, J.-F.
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T12:01:16Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T12:01:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/3161
dc.descriptionWe applied and compared seven vapor pressure estimation methods to the condensable compounds generated in the oxidation of α-pinene, as described by the state-of the- art mechanism of the BOREAM model (Capouet et al., 2008). Several of these methods had to be extended in order to treat functional groups such as hydroperoxides and peroxy acyl nitrates. Large differences in the estimated vapor pressures are reported, which will inevitably lead to large differences in aerosol formation simulations. Cautioning remarks are given for some vapor pressure estimation methods.
dc.languageeng
dc.titleTechnical Note: Vapor pressure estimation methods applied to secondary organic aerosol constituents from α-pinene oxidation: an intercomparison study
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.subject.freeaerosol
dc.subject.freeestimation method
dc.subject.freenitrate
dc.subject.freeoxidation
dc.subject.freevapor pressure
dc.source.titleAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue13
dc.source.page6271-6282
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/acp-10-6271-2010
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957869173


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Compernolle(2010).pdf
Size:
445.0Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record