General comparison of ozone vertical profiles obtained by various techniques during the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign
| dc.contributor.author | Matthews, W.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aimedieu, P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Megie, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pelon, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Attmannspacher, W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Komhyr, W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marché, P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | de la Noë, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rigaud, P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robbins, D.E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Simon, P.C. | |
| dc.date | 1987 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-13T09:29:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-06-13T09:29:26Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/5792 | |
| dc.description | As part of the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign, atmospheric ozone profile measurements were made using a large variety of different techniques both from balloon platforms and the ground. It is shown that, for most techniques, the measured height distributions agree to within ± 5% with the exception of the remote visible absorption method. This ± 5% uncertainty is of the order of the individual inter-system accuracy. It is suggested that since the differences with the visible absorption method are in magnitude rather than in form, that the absorption cross-section data could be the possible cause for the discrepancy. | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.title | General comparison of ozone vertical profiles obtained by various techniques during the 1983 MAP/GLOBUS campaign | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.subject.frascati | Earth and related Environmental sciences | |
| dc.audience | Scientific | |
| dc.source.title | Planetary and Space Science | |
| dc.source.volume | 35 | |
| dc.source.issue | 5 | |
| dc.source.page | 603-607 | |
| Orfeo.peerreviewed | Yes | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/0032-0633(87)90126-7 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-38249033149 |
