Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVogel, F.R.
dc.contributor.authorFrey, M.
dc.contributor.authorStaufer, J.
dc.contributor.authorHase, F.
dc.contributor.authorBroquet, G.
dc.contributor.authorXueref-Remy, I.
dc.contributor.authorChevallier, F.
dc.contributor.authorCiais, P.
dc.contributor.authorSha, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorChelin, P.
dc.contributor.authorJeseck, P.
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, C.
dc.contributor.authorTé, Y.
dc.contributor.authorGroß, J.
dc.contributor.authorBlumenstock, T.
dc.contributor.authorTu, Q.
dc.contributor.authorOrphal, J.
dc.date2019
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-24T18:32:22Z
dc.date.available2019-03-24T18:32:22Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/7206
dc.descriptionProviding timely information on urban greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their trends to stakeholders relies on reliable measurements of atmospheric concentrations and the understanding of how local emissions and atmospheric transport influence these observations. Portable Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers were deployed at five stations in the Paris metropolitan area to provide column-averaged concentrations of CO2 (XCO2) during a field campaign in spring of 2015, as part of the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON). Here, we describe and analyze the variations of XCO2 observed at different sites and how they changed over time. We find that observations upwind and downwind of the city centre differ significantly in their XCO2 concentrations, while the overall variability of the daily cycle is similar, i.e. increasing during night-time with a strong decrease (typically 2–3 ppm) during the afternoon. An atmospheric transport model framework (CHIMERE-CAMS) was used to simulate XCO2 and predict the same behaviour seen in the observations, which supports key findings, e.g. that even in a densely populated region like Paris (over 12 million people), biospheric uptake of CO2 can be of major influence on daily XCO2 variations. Despite a general offset between modelled and observed XCO2, the model correctly predicts the impact of the meteorological parameters (e.g. wind direction and speed) on the concentration gradients between different stations. When analyzing local gradients of XCO2 for upwind and downwind station pairs, those local gradients are found to be less sensitive to changes in XCO2 boundary conditions and biogenic fluxes within the domain and we find the model–data agreement further improves. Our modelling framework indicates that the local XCO2 gradient between the stations is dominated by the fossil fuel CO2 signal of the Paris metropolitan area. This further highlights the potential usefulness of XCO2 observations to help optimize future urban GHG emission estimates.
dc.languageeng
dc.titleXCO2 in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.source.titleAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
dc.source.volume19
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.page3271-3285
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/acp-19-3271-2019


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record