Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinardi, G.
dc.contributor.authorVan Roozendael, M.
dc.contributor.authorHendrick, F.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, A.
dc.contributor.authorValks, P.
dc.contributor.authorAlwarda, R.
dc.contributor.authorBognar, K.
dc.contributor.authorFrieß, U.
dc.contributor.authorGranville, J.
dc.contributor.authorGu, M.
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, P.
dc.contributor.authorPrados-Roman, C.
dc.contributor.authorQuerel, R.
dc.contributor.authorStrong, K.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, T.
dc.contributor.authorWittrock, F.
dc.contributor.authorYela Gonzalez, M.
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09T12:21:20Z
dc.date.available2022-06-09T12:21:20Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/9950
dc.descriptionThis paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced within the framework of EUMETSAT's Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME)-2A and GOME-2B instrument measurements, covering the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from nine Zenith-Scattered-Light Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (ZSL-DOAS) instruments from the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % (i.e., about 3.75×1013 molec. cm−2) between the different ground-based data analyses, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations (i.e., around 4 to 5×1013 molec. cm−2). Time series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data for both the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be noisier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO-activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes with respect to the ground-based data ensemble of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Satellite minus ground-based offsets are within 8×1013 molec. cm−2, with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median offset of about  -2.2x10*13 molec. cm−2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments.
dc.languageeng
dc.titleGround-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.source.titleAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue11
dc.source.page3439-3463
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022
dc.identifier.scopus


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record