The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)
Authors
Skelton, P.H.
Swartz, E R.
Vreven, E.
Discipline
Biological sciences
Subject
Vertebrates
Audience
Scientific
Date
2018Metadata
Show full item recordDescription
The identity of Barbus capensis, as described by Andrew Smith (1841), is reviewed following  a careful examination of the lectotype in the Natural History Museum, London. Evidence shows clearly  that it represents a specimen of the Berg-Breede River whitefish or  witvis  and not the species known  as the Clanwilliam yellowfish, to which it was attributed until recently. The original illustration of the  species is shown to be a composite of these two different species. A replacement name for the Clanwilliam  yellowfish is drawn from the earliest described synonym, Labeobarbus seeberi (Gilchrist & Thompson,  1913). Following widespread recognition that the genus Barbus Daudin, 1805 does not occur in sub-  Saharan Africa, the generic status of the Berg-Breede River whitefish (witvis) and other tetraploid  cyprinines of southern Africa is reviewed, taking genetic and morphological characters into account.  Five distinct lineages, each representing a genus, are recognised, including the genera Pseudobarbus  Smith, 1841 and Cheilobarbus Smith, 1841, and three new genera described herein: Amatolacypris gen.  nov., Sedercypris gen. nov. and Namaquacypris gen. nov.
Citation
Skelton, P.H.; Swartz, E R.; Vreven, E. (2018). The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). , European Journal of Taxonomy, 29, ISSN: 2118-9773, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.410.Identifiers
issn: 2118-9773
Type
Article
Peer-Review
Yes
Language
eng
