Validation of version-4.61 methane and nitrous oxide observed by MIPAS
View/ Open
Authors
Payan, S.
Camy-Peyret, C.
Oelhaf, H.
Wetzel, G.
Maucher, G.
Keim, C.
Pirre, M.
Huret, N.
Engel, A.
Volk, M.C.
Kuellmann, H.
Kuttippurath, J.
Cortesi, U.
Bianchini, G.
Mencaraglia, F.
Raspollini, P.
Redaelli, G.
Vigouroux, C.
De Mazière, M.
Mikuteit, S.
Blumenstock, T.
Velazco, V.
Notholt, J.
Mahieu, E.
Duchatelet, P.
Smale, D.
Wood, S.
Jones, N.
Piccolo, C.
Payne, V.
Bracher, A.
Glatthor, N.
Stiller, G.
Grunow, K.
Jeseck, P.
Te, Y.
Butz, A.
Discipline
Earth and related Environmental sciences
Subject
airborne sensing
airborne survey
algorithm
atmospheric chemistry
balloon observation
Envisat-1
estimation method
ground-based measurement
methane
model validation
nitrous oxide
sampling bias
satellite imagery
SCIAMACHY
stratosphere
troposphere
vertical profile
Audience
Scientific
Date
2009Metadata
Show full item recordDescription
The ENVISAT validation programme for the atmospheric instruments MIPAS, SCIAMACHY and GOMOS is based on a number of balloon-borne, aircraft, satellite and ground-based correlative measurements. In particular the activities of validation scientists were coordinated by ESA within the ENVISAT Stratospheric Aircraft and Balloon Campaign or ESABC. As part of a series of similar papers on other species [this issue] and in parallel to the contribution of the individual validation teams, the present paper provides a synthesis of comparisons performed between MIPAS CH4 and N2O profiles produced by the current ESA operational software (Instrument Processing Facility version4.61 or IPF v4.61, full resolution MIPAS data covering the period 9 July 2002 to 26 March 2004) and correlative measurements obtained from balloon and aircraft experiments as well as from satellite sensors or from ground-based instruments. In the middle stratosphere, no significant bias is observed between MIPAS and correlative measurements, and MIPAS is providing a very consistent and global picture of the distribution of CH4 and N2O in this region. In average, the MIPAS CH4 values show a small positive bias in the lower stratosphere of about 5%. A similar situation is observed for N2O with a positive bias of 4%. In the lower stratosphere/upper troposphere (UT/LS) the individual used MIPAS data version 4.61 still exhibits some unphysical oscillations in individual CH4 and N2O profiles caused by the processing algorithm (with almost no regularization). Takingthese problems into account, the MIPAS CH4 and N2O pro-files are behaving as expected from the internal error estimation of IPF v4.61 and the estimated errors of the correlative measurements.
Citation
Payan, S.; Camy-Peyret, C.; Oelhaf, H.; Wetzel, G.; Maucher, G.; Keim, C.; Pirre, M.; Huret, N.; Engel, A.; Volk, M.C.; Kuellmann, H.; Kuttippurath, J.; Cortesi, U.; Bianchini, G.; Mencaraglia, F.; Raspollini, P.; Redaelli, G.; Vigouroux, C.; De Mazière, M.; Mikuteit, S.; Blumenstock, T.; Velazco, V.; Notholt, J.; Mahieu, E.; Duchatelet, P.; Smale, D.; Wood, S.; Jones, N.; Piccolo, C.; Payne, V.; Bracher, A.; Glatthor, N.; Stiller, G.; Grunow, K.; Jeseck, P.; Te, Y.; Butz, A. (2009). Validation of version-4.61 methane and nitrous oxide observed by MIPAS. , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 413-442,Type
Article
Peer-Review
Yes
Language
eng