• Login
     
    View Item 
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
    • BIRA-IASB publications
    • View Item
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
    • BIRA-IASB publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An intercomparison of ground-based UV-visible sensors of ozone and NO2

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Vaughan(1997a).pdf (855.3Kb)
    Authors
    Vaughan, G.
    Roscoe, H.K.
    Bartlett, L.M.
    O'Connor, F.M.
    Sarkissian, A.
    Van Roozendael, M.
    Lambert, J.-C.
    Simon, P.C.
    Karlsen, K.
    Kåstad, Høiskar, B.A.
    Fish, D.J.
    Jones, R.L.
    Freshwater, R.A.
    Pommereau, J.-P.
    Goutail, F.
    Andersen, S.B.
    Drew, D.G.
    Hughes, P.A.
    Moore, D.
    Mellqvist, J.
    Hegels, E.
    Klupfel, T.
    Erle, F.
    Pfeilsticker, K.
    Platt, U.
    Show allShow less
    Discipline
    Earth and related Environmental sciences
    Audience
    Scientific
    Date
    1997
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    An intercomparison of zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers was held at Camborne, UK, for 2 weeks in September 1994. Eleven instruments participated, from nine different European institutes which were involved with the Second European Stratospheric Arctic and Mid-latitude Experiment (SESAME) campaign. Four instruments were of the Systeme d'Analyse d'Observations Zénithales (SAOZ) type, while the rest were particular to the institutes involved. The results showed that the SAOZ instruments were consistent to within 3% (10 DU) for ozone and 5% for NO2. For ozone the results from these instruments agreed well with total ozone measurements by Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and integrated ozonesondes when the air mass factors for the SAOZ were calculated using the ozonesonde profiles. Differences of up to 10% in ozone and 30% in NO2 were found between different instruments. In some cases these differences are attributable to the different absorption cross sections used in the analysis of the spectra, but other discrepancies remain to be investigated. A prominent source of error identified in the campaign was uncertainty in the derivation of the amount of absorber in the reference spectrum, which can contribute an error of up to 3% (10 DU) in ozone and 1.5 × 1014 molecules cm-2 in NO2.
    Citation
    Vaughan, G.; Roscoe, H.K.; Bartlett, L.M.; O'Connor, F.M.; Sarkissian, A.; Van Roozendael, M.; Lambert, J.-C.; Simon, P.C.; Karlsen, K.; Kåstad, Høiskar, B.A.; Fish, D.J.; Jones, R.L.; Freshwater, R.A.; Pommereau, J.-P.; Goutail, F.; Andersen, S.B.; Drew, D.G.; Hughes, P.A.; Moore, D.; Mellqvist, J.; Hegels, E.; Klupfel, T.; Erle, F.; Pfeilsticker, K.; Platt, U. (1997). An intercomparison of ground-based UV-visible sensors of ozone and NO2. , Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D1, 1411-1422, DOI: 10.1029/96JA01460.
    Identifiers
    uri: https://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/5489
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JA01460
    scopus: 2-s2.0-0001283714
    Type
    Article
    Peer-Review
    Yes
    Language
    eng
    Links
    NewsHelpdeskBELSPO OA Policy

    Browse

    All of ORFEOCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplinesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplines
     

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Send Feedback | Cookie Information
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV