• Login
     
    View Item 
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
    • BIRA-IASB publications
    • View Item
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
    • BIRA-IASB publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison between global chemistry transport model results and Measurement of Ozone and Water Vapor by Airbus In-Service Aircraft (MOZAIC) data

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Law(2000a).pdf (1.949Mb)
    Authors
    Law, K.S.
    Plantevin, P.-H.
    Thouret, V.
    Marenco, A.
    Asman, W.A.H.
    Lawrence, M.
    Crutzen, P.J.
    Muller, J.-F.
    Hauglustaine, D.A.
    Kanakidou, M.
    Show allShow less
    Subject
    atmospheric chemistry
    modeling
    ozone
    Audience
    Scientific
    Date
    2000
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    Ozone distributions from state-of-the-art global three-dimensional chemistry transport models are compared to O3 data collected on Airbus A340 passenger aircraft as part of the Measurement of Ozone and Water Vapor by Airbus In-Service Aircraft (MOZAIC) project. The model results are compared to monthly averaged data at cruise altitudes in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere and monthly averaged vertical profiles collected over particular cities during takeoff and landing. The models generally show good agreement with the data in regions which have previously been well documented and where the meteorology is well understood/captured by meteorological models (e.g., over Europe). However, in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, models often fail to capture sharp gradients across the tropopause and from the subtropics to the tropics. In some models, this is related to deficiencies in model transport schemes and upper boundary conditions. Also, regions of the globe where our understanding of meteorology is poorer and emissions are less well known (e.g., tropics, continental Africa, Asia, and South America) are not simulated as well by all models. At particular measurement locations, it is apparent that emission inventories used by some global models underestimate emissions in certain regions (e.g., over southern Asia) or have incorrect seasonal variations (e.g., biomass burning over South America). Deficiencies in chemical schemes may also explain differences between models and the data.
    Citation
    Law, K.S.; Plantevin, P.-H.; Thouret, V.; Marenco, A.; Asman, W.A.H.; Lawrence, M.; Crutzen, P.J.; Muller, J.-F.; Hauglustaine, D.A.; Kanakidou, M. (2000). Comparison between global chemistry transport model results and Measurement of Ozone and Water Vapor by Airbus In-Service Aircraft (MOZAIC) data. , Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D1, 1503-1525, DOI: 10.1029/1999JD900474.
    Identifiers
    uri: https://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/6126
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900474
    scopus: 2-s2.0-0033789443
    Type
    Article
    Peer-Review
    Yes
    Language
    eng
    Links
    NewsHelpdeskBELSPO OA Policy

    Browse

    All of ORFEOCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplinesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplines
     

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Send Feedback | Cookie Information
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV