Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuerinckx, Annelies
dc.contributor.authorHamdi, Rafiq
dc.contributor.authorDeckmym, Alex
dc.contributor.authorDjebbar, Arab
dc.contributor.authorMahfouf, Jean-Francois
dc.contributor.authorTermonia, Piet
dc.date2017-08-21
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T15:03:26Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T15:03:26Z
dc.identifier.citationDuerinckx, A. , Hamdi, R. , Deckmyn, A. , Djebbar, A. , Mahfouf, J. and Termonia, P. (2017), Combining an EKF soil analysis with a 3D‐Var upper‐air assimilation in a limited‐area NWP model. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 143: 2999-3013. doi:10.1002/qj.3141.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/7269
dc.descriptionIn recent years, the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) has been gaining more attention in the surface data assimilation (DA) community and has already replaced the older Optimal Interpolation (OI) scheme for the vertical component of the land surface DA system in a number of meteorological institutes. An EKF has been developed within the standalone land‐surface modelling platform SURFace Externalisée (SURFEX) for the initialisation of soil temperature and soil water content based on screen‐level temperature and relative humidity. In this article we present a new combination of the EKF with a basic (using conventional observations only) three‐dimensional variational (3D‐Var) upper‐air assimilation for the limited‐area model ALARO coupled to SURFEX. This new combination is compared to an Open Loop experiment where all initial conditions are interpolated from an analysis of the global numerical weather prediction model Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle (ARPEGE) and to an experiment where the surface is initialised using the EKF, while the upper‐air initial conditions are interpolated from the ARPEGE analysis. The aim of this article is to examine whether the EKF surface assimilation coupled or not with a basic 3D‐Var upper‐air assimilation has an added value compared to the Open Loop, in which the more advanced upper‐air data assimilation of ARPEGE with more observations used is interpolated onto the limited‐area model grid. All set‐ups are verified during a 1‐year period 2013 against soil measurements, screen‐level observations, radiosoundings and merged radar–rain‐gauge precipitation observations. Results indicate that the EKF surface assimilation has positive effects on humidity scores and is able to produce similar or improved scores compared to the Open Loop. While the upper‐air 3D‐Var DA system of ALARO still needs improvements, the potential benefits of the combination of upper‐air and surface assimilation are demonstrated through soil moisture and screen‐level relative humidity verifications.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleCombining an EKF soil analysis with a 3D-Var upper-air assimilation in a limited-area NWP modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciencesen_US
dc.audienceScientificen_US
dc.source.titleQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.source.volume143en_US
dc.source.issue709en_US
dc.source.page2999-3013en_US
Orfeo.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3141


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record