Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrimmond, S.
dc.contributor.authorBlackett, M.
dc.contributor.authorBest, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaik, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorBelcher, S.
dc.contributor.authorBeringer, J.
dc.contributor.authorBohnenstengel, S.
dc.contributor.authorCalmet, I.
dc.contributor.authorChen, F.
dc.contributor.authorDandou, A.
dc.contributor.authorFortuniak, K.
dc.contributor.authorGouvea, M.
dc.contributor.authorHamdi, R.
dc.contributor.authorHendry, M.
dc.contributor.authorKanda, M.
dc.contributor.authorKawai, T.
dc.contributor.authorKawamoto, Y.
dc.contributor.authorKondo, H.
dc.contributor.authorKrayenhoff, E.
dc.contributor.authorLee, S.H.
dc.contributor.authorLoridan, T.
dc.contributor.authorMartilli, A.
dc.contributor.authorMasson, V.
dc.contributor.authorMiao, S.
dc.contributor.authorOleson, K.
dc.contributor.authorOoka, R.
dc.contributor.authorPigeon, G.
dc.contributor.authorPorson, A.
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Y.H.
dc.contributor.authorSalamanca, F.
dc.contributor.authorSteeneveld, G.J.
dc.contributor.authorTombrou-Tzella, M.
dc.contributor.authorVoogt, J.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, D.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, N.
dc.coverage.temporal21st century
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-07T16:17:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-09T09:54:13Z
dc.date.available2016-03-07T16:17:05Z
dc.date.available2021-12-09T09:54:13Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/8854
dc.descriptionMany urban land surface schemes have been developed, incorporating different assumptions about the features of, and processes occurring at, the surface. Here, the first results from Phase 2 of an international comparison are presented. Evaluation is based on analysis of the last 12 months of a 15 month dataset. In general, the schemes have best overall capability to model net all-wave radiation. The models that perform well for one flux do not necessarily perform well for other fluxes. Generally there is better performance for net all wave radiation than sensible heat flux. The degree of complexity included in the models is outlined, and impacts on model performance are discussed in terms of the data made available to modellers at four successive stages.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIRM
dc.publisherKMI
dc.publisherRMI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Climatology.
dc.titleInitial Results from Phase 2 of the International Urban Energy Balance Comparison Project
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceGeneral Public
dc.audienceScientific
dc.subject.freeEnergy balance
dc.subject.freefluxes
dc.subject.freemodel complexity
dc.source.issueInternational Journal of Climatology.
dc.source.page1/29/2015
Orfeo.peerreviewedNot pertinent
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.1002/joc.2227


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record