• Login
     
    View Item 
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
    • RMI publications
    • View Item
    •   ORFEO Home
    • Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
    • RMI publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    "Comparison of MIPAS 03 profiles with ground-based measurements"

    Authors
    Blumenstock, T.
    Griesfeller,A.
    Hase, F.
    Schneider, M.
    Boyd, I.
    Calisesi, Y.
    Godin, S.
    Koopman, R.
    Lambert, J.-C.
    Soebijanta, V.
    Swart, D.
    Raffalski, U.
    Schets, H.
    De Muer, D.
    Stebel , K.
    Steinbrecht, W.
    Stubi, R.
    Show allShow less
    Discipline
    Earth and related Environmental sciences
    Subject
    MIPAS 03 profiles
    envisat
    Audience
    General Public
    Scientific
    Date
    2002
    Publisher
    IRM
    KMI
    RMI
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Description
    For the ENVISAT validation different ground-based techniques have been used. MIPAS O3 profiles have been compared with data from different ground-based techniques such as FTIR, LIDAR, O3 sondes, and MWR. All instruments used are operated within the NDS (Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change). These comparisons covering different techniques as well as different latitudes show a consistent picture. All MIPAS data used in this paper are processed with software version 4.53. In most cases the coincidence criteria are 1000 km in space and 12 hours in time, otherwise they are stated in the text. MIPAS O3 profiles measured before November 13, 2002 show an error in altitude assignment of about 1 to 1.5 km. MIPAS O3 profiles versus pressure are not affected by this. The update of the pointing characterization in the data processor as implemented on November 13 has clearly solved this problem. The MIPAS profiles agree quite well with ground-based data. The mean differences are within 10% in an altitude range of about 20 to 40 km. Below 20 km MIPAS tends to slightly overestimate the vmr while above 25 km MIPAS tends to slightly underestimate the vmr. However, more coincidences are needed for a more quantitative analysis.
    Citation
    Blumenstock, T.; Griesfeller,A.; Hase, F.; Schneider, M.; Boyd, I.; Calisesi, Y.; Godin, S.; Koopman, R.; Lambert, J.-C.; Soebijanta, V.; Swart, D.; Raffalski, U.; Schets, H.; De Muer, D.; Stebel , K.; Steinbrecht, W.; Stubi, R. (2002). "Comparison of MIPAS 03 profiles with ground-based measurements". , Issue Proceedings of Envisat Validation Workshop ,9-13 December 2002,SP-531, IRM,
    Identifiers
    uri: https://orfeo.belnet.be/handle/internal/8618
    Type
    Article
    Peer-Review
    Not pertinent
    Language
    eng
    Links
    NewsHelpdeskBELSPO OA Policy

    Browse

    All of ORFEOCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplinesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesDisciplines
     

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Send Feedback | Cookie Information
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV